Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Kidney Dis. 2013 May 20;62(3):595–603. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.03.027

Table 1.

Comparison of Reduced GFR Using Creatinine and Cystatin C with Longitudinal Risks of Death and ESRD

CKD Defined By No. Annual Rate per 1000 persons Addjusted HR*
All-Cause Mortality
Neither 22361 10.9 (10.9–11.0) 1.0 (reference)
Creatinine only 849 15.4 (14.9–15.9) 0.9 (0.7–1.1)
Cystatin C only 1378 47.0 (45.8–48.2) 2.1 (1.9–2.5)
Both 2055 57.8 (56.6–59.1) 2.1 (1.9–2.4)
ESRD
Neither 22361 0.2 (0.1–0.3) 1.0 (reference)
Creatinine only 849 0.5 (0.1–2.2) 2.5 (0.6–10.9)
Cystatin C only 1378 2.2 (1.3–3.8) 5.8 (2.8–12.1)
Both 2055 15.8 (13.5–18.6) 26.1 (14.9–45.7)

Note: Data from REGARDS (Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke) Study over 4.6 years of follow-up. Values in parentheses are 95% confidence intervals.

*

Mortality model adjusts for age, race, sex, income, educational attainment, hypertension, diabetes, prevalent cardiovascular disease, smoking status, BMI, waist circumference, and log albumin-to-creatinine ratio. ESRD model adjusts for age, race, sex, hypertension, diabetes, and log(albumin-creatinine ratio).

Abbreviation: HR, hazard ratio; CKD, chronic kidney disease; GFR, glomulerar filtration rate; ESRD, end-stage renal disease.