Skip to main content
. 2013 May 16;41(7):1109–1120. doi: 10.1007/s10802-013-9744-x

Table 3.

Concurrent validity: association between impact and psychosocial adjustment

Reporting source
Predictors Parent OR 95 % CI Teacher OR 95 % CI Youth OR 95 % CI
Outcome: service contact Impact only 2.63 2.14 1.73
2.35, 2.93 1.89, 2.42 1.50, 1.99
Impact adjusted for baseline total SDQ score 1.76 1.74 1.37
1.12, 1.52 1.39, 2.18 1.25, 1.60
Outcome: self harm Impact only 1.65 1.39 1.41
1.49, 1.82 1.21, 1.60 1.25, 1.60
Impact adjusted for baseline total SDQ score 1.31 1.06ns 1.14ns
1.12, 1.52 0.85, 1.32 0.99, 1.31
Outcome: truancy Impact only 1.70 1.76 1.45
1.52, 1.90 1.54, 2.02 1.27, 1.66
Impact adjusted for baseline total SDQ score 1.35 1.20ns 1.16 ns
1.13, 1.61 0.95, 1.53 0.99, 1.36
Outcome: police contact Impact only 1.56 1.55 1.46
1.40, 1.74 1.33, 1.79 1.28, 1.65
Impact adjusted for baseline total SDQ score 1.10ns 0.97ns 1.23
0.93, 1.31 0.76, 1.24 1.07, 1.43

OR odds ratio; CI 95 % confidence interval. Odds ratios with confidence intervals are presented from logistic regression models with each of the outcomes as dependent variables and impact as an independent variable either unadjusted or adjusted for baseline total SDQ score

All findings in bold are significant (p<0.05)