Skip to main content
. 2013 May 16;41(7):1109–1120. doi: 10.1007/s10802-013-9744-x

Table 5.

Association between impact score at baseline and SDQ total score at follow-up for each informant source (only baseline and 36 month follow-up shown)

Impact score at baseline
Reporting source at baseline
Predictor variables Parent β 95 % CI R 2 Teacher β 95 % CI R 2 Youth β 95 % CI R 2
Outcome: SDQ score at 36 months follow-up Reporting source at outcome Parent Impact score only 0.34 0.41 0.32
0.31, 0.36 0.37, 0.46 0.25, 0.40
R 2 = 0.21 R 2 = 0.13 R 2 = 0.08
Impact score adjusted for baseline SDQ score 0.04 0.11 0.13
0.01, 0.07 0.07, 0.15 0.07, 0.19
R 2 = 0.48 R 2 = 0.48 R 2 = 0.22
Teacher Impact score only 0.22 0.45 0.31
0.19, 0.26 0.40, 0.51 0.19, 0.44
R 2 = 0.09 R 2 = 0.16 R 2 = 0.07
Impact score adjusted for baseline SDQ score 0.09 0.14 0.17
0.06, 0.13 0.06, 0.23 0.05, 0.29
R 2 = 0.25 R 2 = 0.23 R 2 = 0.18
Youth Impact score only 0.19 0.24 0.29
0.16, 0.21 0.18, 0.29 0.22, 0.35
R 2 = 0.07 R 2 = 0.04 R 2 = 0.06
Impact score adjusted for baseline SDQ score 0.04 0.16 0.023ns
0.02, 0.07 0.11, 0.22 0.04, 0.08
R 2 = 0.31 R 2 = 0.08 R 2 = 0.30

β standardized regression coefficient; CI 95 % confidence interval; R 2 = proportion of variance. All findings in bold are significant (p < 0.05); otherwise non-significant (ns); standardized robust regression coefficients and confidence intervals from robust maximum likelihood models are presented in each cell with R 2 as the estimate of the variance predicted