Skip to main content
. 2013 May 16;41(7):1109–1120. doi: 10.1007/s10802-013-9744-x

Table 7.

Association between SDQ total symptom score at baseline and impact at follow-up for each informant source (only baseline and 36 month follow-up shown)

SDQ symptom score at baseline
Reporting source at baseline
Predictor variables Parent β 95 % CI R 2 Teacher β 95 % CI R 2 Youth β 95 % CI R 2
Outcome: impact at 36 months follow-up Reporting source at outcome Parent SDQ score only 0.08 0.05 0.05
0.07, 0.08 0.04, 0.06 0.04, 0.06
R 2 = 0.18 R 2 = 0.09 R 2 = 0.07
SDQ score adjusted for baseline impact 0.03 0.02 0.02
0.02, 0.04 0.01, 0.03 0.01, 0.03
R 2 = 0.28 R 2 = 0.28 R 2 = 0.27
Teacher SDQ score only 0.06 0.07 0.04
0.05, 0.06 0.06, 0.08 0.03, 0.06
R 2 = 0.09 R 2 = 0.14 R 2 = 0.05
SDQ score adjusted for baseline impact 0.03 0.04 0.03
0.02, 0.04 0.03, 0.06 0.02, 0.04
R 2 = 0.17 R 2 = 0.17 R 2 = 0.16
Youth SDQ score only 0.04 0.03 0.04
0.03, 0.04 0.02, 0.03 0.03, 0.06
R 2 = 0.04 R 2 = 0.02 R 2 = 0.05
SDQ score adjusted for baseline impact 0.03 0.02 0.04
0.02, 0.03 0.01, 0.03 0.03, 0.05
R 2 = 0.06 R 2 = 0.05 R 2 = 0.06

β standardized regression coefficient; CI 95 % confidence interval; R 2 = proportion of variance All findings in bold are significant (p < 0.05); otherwise non-significant (ns); standardized regression coefficients and confidence intervals from robust maximum likelihood models are presented in each cell with R 2 as the estimate of the variance predicted