Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun 19;24(9):2245–2255. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt218

Table 1.

Characteristics of studies of Hodgkin lymphoma and cigarette smoking included in the pooled analyses

Data provider (reference) Location Period of interview Age at (pseudo) diagnosis Cases (% part) Controls (% part) Matching Source of controls
Chang [22] Massachusetts, Connecticut (USA) 1998–2002 15–81 500 (85) 614 (56) Frequency matching by age, sex, and state of residence Population controls without a prior history of Hodgkin's lymphoma
Cozen [30, 59] USA and Canada 1961–1992 14–49 86 (70) 87 (70) Twin controls Twin controls
Dal Maso [31, 60] Aviano, Milan (Italy)
Aviano, Naples (Italy)
1983–1992
1998–2002
14–85
18–83
156 (97)
62 (97)
1,149 (97)
499 (91)
Frequency matching by center, gender, and age (5-year age groups) Hospital controls admitted for acute, non-neoplastic, nonimmunological conditions
EpiLymph [24] Spain, France, Italy, Germany, Ireland, Finland and Czech Republic 1998–2004 16–100 324 (88) 2,511 (81) Individual matching (Germany and Czech Republic) or frequency matching (France, Ireland, Italy, and Spain) by sex, age (5-year age groups), and residence area Controls without cancer drawn from population registers (Italy and Germany) or identified in hospitals (Spain, France, Ireland Czech Republic).
Glaser [17] Northern California (USA) 1990–1996 19–79 310 (87) 325 (72) Frequency matching on age (5-year age groups), area, and race/ethnicity Controls without a history of Hodgkin's lymphoma, identified through random digit dialing
Hjalgrim [12] Denmark and Sweden 1999–2003 17–76 571 (91) 3,085 (71) Frequency matching by country, age (10-year age-groups), and sex Controls randomly selected from population registers
Kane [26] North, East, and West Yorkshire, Lancashire, South Lakeland, Cornwall, South Devon, Dorset, South Hampshire (England) 1998–2004 16–67 250 (79) 234 (69) Individual matching by sex, date of birth, and area of residence Controls randomly selected from population registers
Miligi [16] Italian multi-centre 1990–1997 19–81 360 (85) 1,763 (80) Frequency matching by age, sex, and area Controls randomly selected from Demographic or National Health Service registers
Monnereau [9] Bordeaux, Brest, Caen, Lille, Nantes, Toulouse (France) 2000–2004 18–75 139 (97) 411 (93) Individual matching by center, sex, age, and residence Hospital controls with no history of hematological neoplasm
Spinelli [33, 61] Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Quebec, British Columbia, Ontario (Canada) 1991–1993 18–91 262 (68) 1,338 (48) Frequency matching by age, sex, and province (all males) Controls randomly selected from: Health Insurance records (Alberta Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Quebec), computerized telephone listings (Ontario), voter's lists (British Columbia)
Zahm [36, 37] Nebraska (USA)
Kansas (USA)
1986–1987
1982–1984
19–98
17–94
69 (96)
116 (92)
1,384 (84)
878 (93)
Frequency matching on age (5-year age groups), race, sex, area, and vital status Controls without malignancy, identified through random digit dialing, Medicare records, and mortality files