Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Aug 28.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Cancer. 2010 Oct 15;127(8):1905–1912. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25198

Table 1.

Characteristics of study participants from United States (Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium) and Denmark.


United States Denmark
Study base 180 breast imaging facilities from 7 population-based mammography registries of the BCSC All 47 diagnostic mammography clinics in Denmark (screening clinics not included)
Definition of diagnostic mammogram Mammograms recorded as evaluation of breast problem (symptomatic) All mammograms from diagnostic clinics1
Study period 1999–2001 2000
Total number of women 93,585 51,313
Age distribution, years: number (%)2
 20–29 2997 (3.2) 1906 (3.7)
 30–39 19 632(21.0) 8710 (17.0)
 40–49 31 421 (33.6) 13 582 (26.5)
 50–59 20 147 (21.5) 14 871 (29.0)
 60–69 10 510 (11.2) 7653 (14.9)
 70–79 6725 (7.2) 3697 (7.2)
 80–89 2153 (2.3) 894 (1.7)
Breast cancer definition Histology-confirmed invasive carcinoma or DCIS Histology/cytology-confirmed invasive/DCIS
Breast cancer identification Linkage with cancer registries and pathology databases Linkage with nationwide cancer and pathology registries
Examinations supplemented with ultrasound 37% to 52%3 74%
Breast cancer incidence4 97 (USA, white) 84 (Denmark)
1

Outside the two organized screening programmes, asymptomatic women can be referred to diagnostic mammography clinics for opportunistic screening. This happened seldom, as the annual utilization rate of all diagnostic mammography (symptomatic and asymptomatic women together) was only 2.7% in women aged >25 in 2000 (21).

2

Number of women (%)

3

Depending on registry.

4

Age-standardized rate per 100,000 (WHO World Standard Population) for the year 2000 (22).