Table 3.
Association of diabetic status in ESRD patients with getting listed/transplanted in the entire study population and study groups by Cox model1
Outcome: listed/transplanted without being listed. | Outcome: transplant for those who got listed. | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Hazard ratio (95% CI) | P | Hazard ratio (95% CI) | P | |
Diabetes in the entire study population | 1.07(1.05–1.09) | <0.001 | 1.01(0.99–1.03) | 0.42 |
Diabetes by age group (yr) | ||||
18–40 | 0.94(0.91–0.97) | 0.003 | 1.18(1.13–1.24) | <0.001 |
41–65 | 0.96(0.94–0.97) | <0.001 | 0.84(0.82–0.87) | <0.001 |
66–80 | 1.21(1.16–1.26) | <0.001 | 0.98(0.92–1.04) | 0.46 |
Diabetes in males | 1.14(1.11–1.16) | <0.001 | 1.07(1.04–1.10) | <0.001 |
Diabetes in females | 0.98(0.96–1.01) | 0.13 | 0.93(0.89–0.96) | <0.001 |
Diabetes in Whites | 1.02(1.00–1.04) | 0.02 | 0.97(0.94–1.00) | 0.01 |
Diabetes in African Americans | 1.14(1.10–1.17) | <0.001 | 1.16(1.11–1.22) | <0.001 |
Diabetes in Asians | 1.02(0.95–1.09) | 0.67 | 0.85(0.76–0.95) | 0.003 |
Diabetes in Native Americans | 1.07(0.92–1.25) | 0.38 | 0.87(0.70–1.08) | 0.20 |
Diabetes in Others | 1.25(1.09–1.43) | 0.001 | 1.21(0.99–1.49) | 0.06 |
The results shown in the table were derived from 22 separate proportional hazard models, each of them adjusted for the following covariates: age at ESRD onset, race, sex, diabetic status, body mass index, comorbidity index, geographic location, duration of pre-ESRD nephrology care, eGFR, serum albumin, hemoglobin, and median income.