Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Aug 29.
Published in final edited form as: Prev Med. 2011 Mar 22;52(5):293–299. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.03.008

Table 2.

Regression slopes for body mass index (BMI) and body circumferences vs. reported obesity status of the subject’s mother (kg/m2 or cm per increment) and father (kg/m2 or cm per increment) adjusted for age, education, and alcohol intake and stratified by walking distance for walkers surveyed in the United States in 2000.

Dependent variable
BMI (kg/m2) Waist circumference (cm) Chest circumference (cm) Hip circumference (cm)
Mother’s contribution
Female walkers
 <1.5 km/d 0.98±0.08§ 1.82±0.21§ 1.23±0.15§ 2.25±0.20§
 1.5–3 km/d 0.78±0.06§ 1.47±0.17§ 0.99±0.12§ 1.46±0.16§
 3–4.5 km/d 0.57±0.08§ 0.95±0.20§ 0.52±0.15 1.07±0.18§
 ≥4.5 km/d 0.58±0.07§ 1.04±0.18§ 0.52±0.13§ 1.16±0.16§
 Interaction P<107 P<105 P<105 P<105
Male walkers
 <1.5 km/d 0.91±0.14§ 2.14±0.37§ 1.96±0.37§
 1.5–3 km/d 0.88±0.12§ 1.80±0.32§ 1.56±0.33§
 3–4.5 km/d 0.60±0.15§ 1.01±0.37 1.80±0.39§
 ≥4.5 km/d 0.53±0.13§ 0.84±0.33* 0.89±0.36
 Interaction P=0.02 P=0.02 P=0.09
Father’s contribution
Female walkers
 <1.5 km/d 1.04±0.09§ 1.62±0.22§ 1.25±0.16§ 1.84±0.21§
 1.5–3 km/d 0.82±0.07§ 1.46±0.18§ 1.18±0.13§ 1.59±0.16§
 3–4.5 km/d 0.72±0.08§ 1.20±0.21§ 0.82±0.16§ 1.32±0.19§
 ≥4.5 km/d 0.72±0.07§ 1.00±0.19§ 0.60±0.14§ 1.16±0.17§
 Interaction P<0.0001 P=0.002 P=0.0002 P=0.0002
Male walkers
 <1.5 km/d 0.78±0.15§ 1.88±0.39§ 1.55±0.38§
 1.5–3 km/d 0.63±0.13§ 1.40±0.34§ 1.19±0.35
 3–4.5 km/d 0.31±0.16* 1.05±0.39§ 1.20±0.43
 ≥4.5 km/d 0.60±0.13§ 1.47±0.34§ 1.34±0.37
 Interaction P=0.07 P=0.36 P=0.71

Adjusted for age, education, and alcohol intake. Significance levels coded:

*

P<0.05,

P<0.01,

P<0.001,

§

P<0.0001.