Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug 28;33(35):14040–14047. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1176-13.2013

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

RT results indicated a significant interaction between surprising (invalid) and unsurprising (valid) conditions (ANCOVA controlled for individual differences in WM capacity; F(1,15) = 9.43, p = 0.008), suggesting that the subjects were able to discriminate the cues behaviorally. The MAI-set predicts the MAI event, whereas the UPD-set predicts the UPD event, both at 80% probability.