RT results indicated a significant interaction between surprising (invalid) and unsurprising (valid) conditions (ANCOVA controlled for individual differences in WM capacity; F(1,15) = 9.43, p = 0.008), suggesting that the subjects were able to discriminate the cues behaviorally. The MAI-set predicts the MAI event, whereas the UPD-set predicts the UPD event, both at 80% probability.