Skip to main content
. 2012 Sep 4;39(5):979–992. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbs080

Table 3.

Effect Sizes, Heterogeneity across Studies, and Publication Bias

Domain k ES (g) CI P Q df P n (NC) n (SC) Fail-safe n a Bias Coefficient Bias SE P
Theory of mind 50    0.96 ±13 <0.001 146.19 49 <0.001 1536 1760 191    3.2 0.80 <0.001
Social perception 13    1.04 ±25 <0.001   37.91 12 <0.001   450   503 54    3.72 1.77    0.06
Social knowledge   7    0.54 ±17 <0.001   10.48   6   0.106   263   298 12    3.62 2.69    0.237
Externalizing bias   5 −0.02 ±38   0.918   14.56   4   0.006   225   221 −6 −0.71 3.26    0.841
Personalizing bias   5 −0.17 ±55   0.532   29.33   4 <0.001   225   221 −9 −6.61 2.52    0.079
Emotion perception 62    0.89 ±17 <0.001 324.63 61 <0.001 1715 1935 214    4.17 1.11 <0.001
Emotion processing 12    0.88 ±30 <0.001   54.56 11 <0.001   638   574 41 −1.09 1.67    0.528

Note: k, number of studies; ES, effect size (Hedge’s g); CI, confidence interval; Q, homogeneity analysis.

aNumber of studies with effect size of 0 needed to reduce the mean effect size to a criterion level (ie, d = medium effect size of 0.5 or small effect size of 0.2).