Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Aug 29.

Published in final edited form as: Psychiatry Res. 2009 Apr 24;167(3):202–220. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2008.03.021

Fig. 3 — Comparison of the stimulus-locked ERP between the GTS (dotted curve) and the control (solid curve) group in response to the compatible (panel a), incompatible (panel b) in the stimulus–response compatibility task. The P300 peak latency in the compatible and no-go trials was equivalent across groups, while the incompatible trials elicited delayed peak latency in the GTS (dotted curve) compared to the control (solid curve) group.

Fig. 3 — Comparison of the stimulus-locked ERP between the GTS (dotted curve) and the control (solid curve) group in response to the compatible (panel a), incompatible (panel b) in the stimulus–response compatibility task. The P300 peak latency in the compatible and no-go trials was equivalent across groups, while the incompatible trials elicited delayed peak latency in the GTS (dotted curve) compared to the control (solid curve) group.