Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Neurosci. 2013 Aug 4;16(9):1340–1347. doi: 10.1038/nn.3477

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Comparison of activation measures in arm M1. (a) Peak activation was measured in 2 mm2 areas of interest over the most intense activation in arm M1. (b) Area measures were normalized by calculating the percentage of significantly activated pixels within each region of M1. We assessed group differences (Lick, n = 2; Rem and Repeating [internally-generated], n = 5; Track and Random [visually-guided], n = 5) with a 2-way (measure, group) ANOVA (d.f. = 2, 9) and post-hoc comparison of means. The probabilities shown are after Bonferroni correction. Error bars are s.d..