Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Aug 30.
Published in final edited form as: J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2009;20(0):1005–1030. doi: 10.1163/156856209X444402

Table 5. Live adherent cell density of keratinocytes co-cultured with fibroblasts on sIPN, PEG hydrogel and PC surfaces.

Surface Exogenous KGF Live adherent keratinocyte density (cells/mm2) after

2 h 24 h 96 h 168 h
MPEG-sIPN No 1±1 0±0 0±1 6±6
Yes 1±1 0±0 1±1 3±1
GGG-sIPN No 1±1 5±7 0±0 2±2
Yes 0±0 0±0 1±1 3±3
RGD-sIPN No 5±2a,b 4±4 0±0 1±1
Yes 1±1 1±0 1±1 4±5
PHSRN-sIPN No 3±0a,b 16±6a,c 10±16 10±4
Yes 0±0 1±2 1±2 4±5
Gelatin-sIPN No 0±0 3±1 0±1 6±6
Yes 1±1 2±1 0±0 0±0
PEG hydrogel No 12±5d 5±3 5±2 25±14
Yes 7±8 6±10 6±10 1±1
PC (keratinocyte co-culture) No 12±7d 11±7 25±17e 204±95d
Yes 13±8f 15±4f 89±105f 156±94f
PC (keratinocyte monoculture) No 7±0 33±26d 78±21d 332±184d
Yes 12±6f 14±6f 82±12f 236±153f
a

P < 0.05 vs. same substrate with exogenous KGF at the same time point.

b

P < 0.05 vs. sIPN control substrates prepared without exogenous KGF.

c

P < 0.05 vs. all other sIPN substrates prepared without exogenous KGF.

d

P < 0.05 vs. sIPN substrates prepared without exogenous KGF at the same time point.

e

P < 0.05 vs. keratinocyte monoculture without exogenous KGF.

f

P < 0.05 vs. sIPN substrates prepared with exogenous KGF at the same time point.