Table 4.
|
|
PRIORITY E-HEALTH (INTERNET-BASED) APPLICATIONS ACCORDING TO RESPONDENTS' OPINIONS |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VARIABLE | CATEGORIES | APPOINTMENT WITH PHYSICIAN | P | ACCESS TO LABORATORY TESTS | P | EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES | P |
Sexa | Female | 2.88 (1.20) | 0.68 | 2.56 (1.12) | 0.43 | 2.41 (1.03) | 0.10 |
Male | 2.83 (1.12) | 2.70 (1.14) | 2.68 (1.15) | ||||
Age (years)b | <39 | 3.15 (1.09) | 0.08 | 2.90 (1.10) | 0.17 | 2.85 (1.09) | 0.04 |
≥39 to <52 | 2.89 (1.13) | 2.63 (1.20) | 2.34 (1.05) | ||||
≥52 to <61 | 3.00 (1.16) | 2.68 (1.13) | 2.71 (1.01) | ||||
≥61 | 2.50 (1.24) | 2.35 (1.12) | 2.23 (1.17) | ||||
Place of residenceb | Rural | 2.69 (1.12) | 0.20 | 2.43 (1.10) | 0.19 | 2.43 (1.08) | 0.53 |
Urban <100,000 | 2.97 (1.00) | 2.61 (0.93) | 2.58 (0.84) | ||||
Urban >100,000 | 2.97 (1.27) | 2.77 (1.23) | 2.58 (1.22) | ||||
Educationb | Level A | 2.41 (1.09)*,† | <0.001 | 2.21 (1.07)* | <0.001 | 2.15 (1.00)* | <0.001 |
Level B | 3.08 (1.15)* | 2.54 (1.13)† | 2.54 (1.05) | ||||
Level C | 3.20 (1.12)† | 3.15 (1.00)*,† | 2.94 (1.09)* | ||||
Duration (years) of chronic diseaseb | <5 | 3.36 (0.83) | 0.02 | 3.06 (0.95) | 0.02 | 3.00 (0.89)* | 0.01 |
≥5 to <9 | 2.61 (1.37) | 2.29 (1.21) | 2.29 (1.11) | ||||
≥9 to <16 | 2.68 (1.06) | 2.46 (1.10) | 2.29 (1.01)* | ||||
≥16 | 3.00 (1.21) | 2.77 (1.13) | 2.67 (1.20) | ||||
Admission to hospitala | No | 2.85 (1.09) | 0.78 | 2.62 (0.99) | 0.91 | 2.44 (0.85) | 0.51 |
Yes | 2.87 (1.19) | 2.61 (1.17) | 2.55 (1.15) | ||||
Computer usea | No | 2.38 (1.06) | <0.001 | 2.15 (0.93) | <0.001 | 2.09 (0.87) | <0.001 |
Yes | 3.10 (1.14) | 2.85 (1.14) | 2.74 (1.12) | ||||
Internet usea | No | 2.41 (1.05) | <0.001 | 2.25 (0.96) | <0.001 | 2.14 (0.90) | <0.001 |
Yes | 3.19 (1.14) | 2.88 (1.16) | 2.79 (1.13) |
Data are mean (standard deviation) values.
The differences between subcategories of grouping variables were assessed using the Mann–Whitney U test to compare rank values (Likert scale) for grouping variables from two categories.
The differences between subcategories of grouping variables were assessed using the analysis of variance rank Kruskal–Wallis test.
,†Pairs of categories of grouping variables with significant differences in the post hoc multiple comparisons test following the analysis of variance rank Kruskal–Wallis analysis are marked with the same symbol.