Table 3.
CONDITION | N | MEAN | SD | T TEST | EFFECT SIZE (D) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Evaluation 1: comfort with talking to clinicians | |||||
InP | 11 | 6.82 | 0.41 | t19=0.89 | 0.38 |
IVC | 10 | 6.30 | 1.89 | p=0.39 | |
Evaluation 2: felt clinicians cared | |||||
InP | 11 | 6.73 | 0.47 | t19=0.91 | 0.39 |
IVC | 10 | 6.20 | 1.87 | p=0.38 | |
Evaluation 3: competent clinicians | |||||
InP | 11 | 6.91 | 0.30 | t8.30=0.86 | 0.41 |
IVC | 9 | 6.33 | 2.00 | p=0.42 | |
Evaluation 4: felt embarrassed | |||||
InP | 11 | 6.00 | 1.90 | t19=0.95 | −0.10 |
IVC | 10 | 6.20 | 1.93 | p=0.36 | |
Evaluation 5: difficulty hearing | |||||
InP | 11 | 6.91 | 0.30 | t19=0.70 | 0.30 |
IVC | 10 | 6.70 | 0.95 | p=0.50 | |
Evaluation 6: no trouble seeing | |||||
InP | 11 | 5.82 | 2.40 | t19=0.81 | 0.35 |
IVC | 10 | 4.90 | 2.77 | p=0.43 | |
Evaluation 7: overall satisfaction | |||||
InP | 11 | 6.82 | 0.41 | t10=–1.49 | –0.62 |
IVC | 10 | 7.00 | 0.00 | p=0.17 | |
Mean satisfaction Items 1–7 | |||||
InP | 11 | 6.57 | 0.49 | t19=1.16 | 0.50 |
IVC | 10 | 6.23 | 0.82 | p=0.26 |
Evaluation questions 4 and 5 were reverse-scored to create high scores=high satisfaction.
InP, in-person; IVC, interactive videoconferencing; SD, standard deviation.