Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep;19(9):671–677. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2012.0312

Table 3.

Mean Satisfaction Ratings by Condition

CONDITION N MEAN SD T TEST EFFECT SIZE (D)
Evaluation 1: comfort with talking to clinicians
 InP 11 6.82 0.41 t19=0.89 0.38
 IVC 10 6.30 1.89 p=0.39  
Evaluation 2: felt clinicians cared
 InP 11 6.73 0.47 t19=0.91 0.39
 IVC 10 6.20 1.87 p=0.38  
Evaluation 3: competent clinicians
 InP 11 6.91 0.30 t8.30=0.86 0.41
 IVC 9 6.33 2.00 p=0.42  
Evaluation 4: felt embarrassed
 InP 11 6.00 1.90 t19=0.95 −0.10
 IVC 10 6.20 1.93 p=0.36  
Evaluation 5: difficulty hearing
 InP 11 6.91 0.30 t19=0.70 0.30
 IVC 10 6.70 0.95 p=0.50  
Evaluation 6: no trouble seeing
 InP 11 5.82 2.40 t19=0.81 0.35
 IVC 10 4.90 2.77 p=0.43  
Evaluation 7: overall satisfaction
 InP 11 6.82 0.41 t10=–1.49 –0.62
 IVC 10 7.00 0.00 p=0.17  
Mean satisfaction Items 1–7
 InP 11 6.57 0.49 t19=1.16 0.50
 IVC 10 6.23 0.82 p=0.26  

Evaluation questions 4 and 5 were reverse-scored to create high scores=high satisfaction.

InP, in-person; IVC, interactive videoconferencing; SD, standard deviation.