Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013 Jun;45(6):1089–1096. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31828121d0

Table 2.

Hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for self-reported physician-diagnosed incident cataracts vs. exercise from Cox proportional hazard analyses.

BMI not included BMI included
Sample size (N) 47,527 46,940
Incident events 1807 1772
Runners (0,1) 0.72 (0.60, 0.86) 0.71 (0.59, 0.85)
Energy expenditure (per METh/d)
    Running 0.96 (0.94, 0.99) 0.96 (0.94, 0.99)
    Walking 0.92§ (0.88, 0.96) 0.92§ (0.89, 0.96)
    Other vigorous 0.98* (0.97, 1.00) 0.98* (0.97, 1.00)
    Other moderate 1.02 (1.00, 1.05) 1.02 (1.00, 1.05)
    Other light 1.02 (0.92, 1.10) 1.02 (0.92, 1.10)
BMI (per kg/m2) 1.01 (0.99, 1.02)
Comparison between coefficients Ratio of hazard ratio
Running vs. walking 1.05 (1.00, 1.10) 1.05 (1.00, 1.10)
Running vs. other vigorous 0.98 (0.95, 1.01) 0.98 (0.95, 1.01)
Walking vs. other moderate 0.90 (0.85, 0.94) 0.90 (0.86, 0.95)

The model included all of the variables listed above, along with baseline age (age, age2), sex, race (self identified African-American, Hispanic, Asian, Native American), education, smoking (current smoker vs. non-smoker), and intakes of meat, fruit, and alcohol. Significance levels for individual coefficients are coded

*

P<0.05

P<0.01

P<0.001

§

P<0.0001.