Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pain. 2013 Apr 8;154(9):1528–1541. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.04.010

Table 3. Regional FA differences between HC and IBS patients.

Level of significance, P = 0.0104. False discovery rate (FDR), q = 0.05. Minimum cluster size = 250 uL.

Anatomic Region(s) Cluster Volume [uL] Control vs. IBS
Bilateral Globus Pallidus - Internal Segment 11830 Higher FA in Controls
Bilateral Thalamus - Medial Dorsal Nuclei
Bilateral Putamen
Bilateral Substantia Nigra
R. Coronal Radiata 1886 Higher FA in Controls
R. Sensory Association Fibers from Thalamus
R. S1/2 M1
L. Coronal Radiata 1814 Higher FA in Controls
L. Sensory Association Fibers from Thalamus
L. S1/2 M1
R. Posterior Cingulate (White Matter) 915 Higher FA in Controls
L. Posterior Cingulate (White Matter) 488 Higher FA in Controls
R. Anterior Cingulate (White Matter) 2013 Higher FA in IBS
R. Pre-Frontal White Matter Projections
L. Anterior Cingulate (White Matter) 1032 Higher FA in IBS
L. Pre-Frontal White Matter Projections
Corpus Callosum 2129 Higher FA in IBS