Table 2.

The statistical significance (5%) level of sexual abuse, physical abuse, emotional abuse, neglect and witnessed violence in explaining youth engagement in either alcohol use or sexual intercourse or both^ab.

	Model 1 SA Only Either Both		Model 2 SA & PA Either Both		Model 3 SA & EA Either Both		Model 4 SA & Neglect Either Both		Model 5 SA & WV Either Both
Abuse/Violence
Block 1
Child Genderc	ns	S-
Block 2
Sexual Abuse (SA)d		S+	S+
Block 3
Physical Abuse (PA)e			ns	S+
Emotional Abuse (EA)1f					ns	ns
Emotional Abuse (EA) 2 g					ns	S+
Neglect (N) 1h							ns	ns
Neglect (N) 2 i							ns	ns
Witnessed Violence (WV)1 j									ns	ns
Witnessed Violence (WV) 2 k									ns	ns

^a2-way interactions of SA x Gender and SA x respective maltreatment or witnessed violence experience were entered on Block 4 of Models 2 to 5; however, since none of the 2-way interactions were statistically significant they were not included in the Table.

^bSite was not covaried in analyses as already controlled in trajectory analyses;

^cboy = 0, girl = 1;

^dCurvilinear group relative to low group;

^eHigh Level Remit relative to no allegations;

^fLow Level Chronic relative to No Allegations;

^fHigh Level Remit relative to No Allegations;

^gLow Level Chronic relative to No Allegations;

^hHigh Level Remit relative to No Allegations;

ⁱLow Level Chronic relative to No Allegations;

^jHigh Level Chronic relative to No Allegations note: S = p < .05; ; (+ or – reflects direction of association); n.s. = not significant