Color |
Direct determination |
514.5 |
1000 |
Optical (Absorption-Based) |
5 min |
Sample handling |
Dyed fibres |
[76] |
Color |
Leather Dye Mixture Color (Red-Blue-Yellow) |
400 to 900 |
Differentiate mixture of color, errors5.6 to10.7 and 6.9 to12.5% |
Optical (Absorption-Based) |
Once the PLSR method is optimized, new samples can be determined. |
Sample handling |
Leather dye detection |
[77] |
Color |
Indigo Solution |
635 |
800 to 12000, errors 0.5% |
Optical (Absorption-Based) |
15 min |
Real time monitoring |
Denim yarn |
[78] |
Color |
Red, Amber, Blue solution |
300 to 900 |
36 to1000, errors 1% |
FOS |
10 spectra were taken and averaged |
Sample handling |
Textile industry-dye bath |
[79] |
COD |
Direct determination |
254 & 356 |
0 to360 ± 1.8 |
Optical (Absorption-Based) |
∼2 min |
Sample handling |
Printing and dyeing wastewater |
[80] |
COD |
Direct determination |
excitation wavelengths from 250 to 600 |
13 to 456 ± 6% |
Optical (Synchronous Fluorescence) |
Standard laboratory device. |
Sample handling |
Waste water from urban and non-urban area |
[3] |
COD |
Phthalatehydrogen potassium for oxidation |
near-infrared (NIR) transmission & ultraviolet absorbance (254) |
5 to 400 ± 2% |
Optical (Absorption-Based) |
--- |
Real time monitoring |
Organic pollutant |
[24] |
COD |
Potassium hydrogen phthalate solution |
200 to 720 |
30 to 1000 ± 1% |
Optical |
5 min |
Real time monitoring |
Lakes, river or waste water |
[81] |
COD |
Direct determination |
UV-220 & 254 emission spectra 300 to 550 |
1.6 to 20.6 ± 3% |
Optical |
-- |
Real time monitoring |
Urban river water |
[82] |
COD |
Direct determination |
258 to 380& UV |
0 to 350 ± 6% |
FOS |
62 s |
Real time monitoring |
Wastewater quality monitoring |
[83] |
BOD |
Direct determination |
220 to 1,100; excitation/emission 280/350 |
0 to 400 |
Optical (Absorption and Fluorescence Technique) |
Standard laboratory device. |
Sample handling |
Sewage sample |
[84] |
BOD |
Direct determination |
190 to 900 |
100 to 10,000 |
Optical |
Standard laboratory device. |
Sample handling |
Dirty water, slurry water |
[25] |
BOD |
Direct determination |
Excitation 250 to 600 nm |
5.2 to 208 ± 8% |
Optical (Synchronous Fluorescence) |
Standard laboratory device. |
Sample handling |
Waste water from urban and non-urban area |
[3] |
BOD |
Direct Determination |
220 to 1,100 ;excitation λ 250 to 400 nm; emission λ 300 to 550 nm |
0.5 to 25.4 ± 3% |
Optical (Absorption and Flurescence) |
Standard laboratory device |
Sample handling |
Urban river water |
[82] |
BOD |
Direct determination |
254 nm and fluorescence intensity 270 ∼ 300, 310 ∼ 370, 370 ∼ 400 & 400 ∼ 530 |
Waste water = 6.5 to 139.9 ± 10%; River water = 1.3 to 1.9 ± 22% |
Optical (Absorption and Synchronous Flurescence) |
Predict BOD by using multiple regression analysis |
Sample handling |
River water samples wastewater treatment plant effluent |
[28] |
BOD |
Tris(4,7-diphenyl-l,lOphenanthroline) ruthenium(II) perchlorate; Trichosporon cufaneum
|
480, excitation 610 nm. |
3 to 110 ± 4% |
FOS |
3–10 min |
Rapid feedback signal, very low costs |
Sewage plant effluent and municipal sewage |
[85] |
BOD |
Pseudomonas putida |
Used current |
1 to 10 ± 20% |
FOS (Fluorescenc-Based) |
15 min |
Long-term stability, no calibration drift occurs, not affected by heavy metal ions and chlorine concentration |
River Water |
[86] |
BOD |
Ru(I1) polypyridyl complex |
Red-excitation, Blue-emmision |
-- |
FOS |
-- |
Real time monitoring |
Waste water |
[87] |
BOD |
Tris(4,7-diphenyl-1, 10-phenanthroline) ruthenium(II) dye;B. subtilis, &activated sludge |
Four LED blue light (460 nm) |
25 to 60 ± 14% |
FOS (Fluorescenc-Based) |
15–30 min (by batch) |
Sample handling |
GGA, domestic and synthetic WW, OECD |
[88] |
BOD |
4,7-diphenyl-1,10-phenanthroline Ru(dpp)32+; B. licheniformis, D. marisand M.marinus
|
Blue LED (465 nm) |
0.2 to 40 |
FOS (Fluorescenc-Based) |
3.2 min |
without dramatically affected by sodium chloride |
Seawater |
[89] |