Table 2.
Correlation matrix.
| SWAN I | SWAN C | CONG | INC | RT CONG | RT INC | RTV CONG | RTV INC | RTD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VS | −0.41*** | −0.42*** | 0.32** | 0.15 | −0.12 | −0.057 | −0.43*** | −0.34** | 0.22* |
| SWAN I | 0.95*** | −0.21 | −0.13 | 0.084 | 0.0057 | 0.23* | 0.18 | −0.15 | |
| SWAN C | −0.19 | −0.075 | 0.12 | 0.0085 | 0.27* | 0.2 | −0.22 | ||
| CONG | 0.81*** | 0.27* | 0.34** | −0.41*** | −0.62*** | 0.32** | |||
| INC | 0.63*** | 0.6*** | −0.057 | −0.4*** | 0.13 | ||||
| RT CONG | 0.94*** | 0.55*** | 0.23* | 0.069 | |||||
| RT INC | 0.47*** | 0.2 | 0.37*** | ||||||
| RTV CONG | 0.7*** | −0.11 | |||||||
| RTV INC | −0.075 |
It should be noted that bigger scores in the SWAN I and SWAN H scales are associated with poorer attention and higher hyperactivity respectively; both these variables are negatively correlated with the ability to synchronize. Higher variability in reaction time has also been associated with poorer attention. Individual correlations:
p < 0.05,
p < 0.01,
p < 0.001.