Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 2;4:564. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00564

Table 2.

Correlation matrix.

SWAN I SWAN C CONG INC RT CONG RT INC RTV CONG RTV INC RTD
VS −0.41*** −0.42*** 0.32** 0.15 −0.12 −0.057 −0.43*** −0.34** 0.22*
SWAN I 0.95*** −0.21 −0.13 0.084 0.0057 0.23* 0.18 −0.15
SWAN C −0.19 −0.075 0.12 0.0085 0.27* 0.2 −0.22
CONG 0.81*** 0.27* 0.34** −0.41*** −0.62*** 0.32**
INC 0.63*** 0.6*** −0.057 −0.4*** 0.13
RT CONG 0.94*** 0.55*** 0.23* 0.069
RT INC 0.47*** 0.2 0.37***
RTV CONG 0.7*** −0.11
RTV INC −0.075

It should be noted that bigger scores in the SWAN I and SWAN H scales are associated with poorer attention and higher hyperactivity respectively; both these variables are negatively correlated with the ability to synchronize. Higher variability in reaction time has also been associated with poorer attention. Individual correlations:

*

p < 0.05,

**

p < 0.01,

***

p < 0.001.