Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug;3(4):200–209. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-4292.2013.08.02

Table 2. Evaluation of functional parameters.

Patient group ESV (mL)
EDV (mL)
EF (%)
LVM (g)
Difference P R2 Difference P R2 Difference P R2 Difference P R2
HFI 2.72±13.77 0.26 0.98 1.47±17.11 0.62 0.96 –0.43±4.36 0.57 0.77 5.34±16.56 0.07 0.78
HFNI 3.19±12.51 0.17 0.97 2.47±13.18 0.31 0.97 –0.51±4.33 0.53 0.90 2.20±15.32 0.44 0.90
HYP –0.41±12.59 0.86 0.80 1.73±13.87 0.49 0.91 1.01±9.45 0.55 0.51 –3.22±11.80 0.13 0.95
HEA 0.71±4.99 0.39 0.94 1.21±4.75 0.13 0.98 –0.15±4.28 0.84 0.73 –1.51±13.89 0.51 0.71
Overall 1.51±11.30 0.13 0.98 1.69±12.76 0.13 0.98 –0.02±5.93 0.97 0.90 0.66±14.72 0.60 0.88

Difference: mean ± standard deviation of paired difference (manual measurement minus automated measurement). Probabilities (P) were obtained by paired sample t-test. For linear regression the automatically obtained values (y) were plotted as a function of the manual values (x) to calculate the fits and coefficients of determination (R2). EDV, end diastolic volume; EF, ejection fraction; ESV, end systolic volume; LVM, left ventricular mass; HEA, healthy; HFI, heart failure with ischemia; HFNI, heart failure with no ischemia; HYP, hypertrophy