Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 May 21.
Published in final edited form as: Phys Med Biol. 2013 Apr 30;58(10):3461–3480. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/10/3461

Figure 11.

Figure 11

Reconstruction uncertainty caused by CDF depth position. (a) Measured (red line) and reconstructed (dashed blue line) light fluence rate profile for source-detection pair E12 under correct CDF position (black line). (b) Measured (red line) and reconstructed (dashed blue line) light fluence rate profile for source-detection pair E12 under shifted CDF position (dotted black line). (c) Reconstructed absorption coefficient (blue line) and reduced scattering coefficient (dashed green line) based on the correct CDF depth positions along position x = 4.25 cm and y = 2.25 cm as shown in Figure 2b. (d) Reconstructed absorption coefficient (blue line) and reduced scattering coefficient (dashed green line) based on the shifted CDF depth along the same positions as (c).