Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct;23(5):363–367. doi: 10.1089/nat.2013.0426

Table 1.

Effect of the Anti-rpoA and Anti-rpoD PNAs on Growth of Listeria monocytogenes in Pure Culture

 
5 μM
10 μM
15 μM
30 μM
40 μM
PNA Name Log CFU (±SD) Reduction log from H2O Log CFU (±SD) Reduction log from H2O Log CFU (±SD) Reduction log from H2O Log CFU (±SD) Reduction log from H2O Log CFU (±SD) Reduction log from H2O
Anti-rpoA 4.96±(0.31) 1.31* 4.30±(0.13) 1.97* 3.83±(0.23) 2.44* 3.52±(0.29) 2.68* Cleared 6.16*
Anti-rpoD 6.09±(0.06) 0.19 5.79±(0.13) 0.48* 5.43±(0.09) 0.85* 3.69±(0.32) 2.50* Cleared 6.16*
Control
PNA
6.63±(0.12) −0.36 6.53±(0.05) −0.26 6.14±(0.25) 0.14 5.23±(0.26) 0.97* 4.44±(0.33) 1.71*
Water 6.27±(0.59) 0 6.27±(0.59) 0 6.27±(0.59) 0 6.19±(0.22) 0 6.16±(0.87) 0

The peptide nucleic acids (PNAs) were incubated with 5×103 L. monocytogenes at 37°C for 8 hours. Colony forming units (CFU) were counted on trypticase soy agar.

*

Values found to be significantly different (p≤0.05) from water by statistical analysis (analysis of variance and Fisher's least significant difference comparisons test).

CFU, colony forming units; SD, standard deviation.