Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 3;4:91. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2013.00091

Table 3.

Correlations between neurocognitive measures and other important measures.

Age Age of onset Duration Abstinence IGT IGT 2 Logk_10_1 Logk_30_1 Logk_100_1 Logk_10_2 Logk_30_2 Logk_100_2
Age 1 0.27 0.63** −0.25 0.06 −0.09 0.06 0.03 0.19 −0.16  −0.14  −0.17 
Age of onset 1 −0.28  −0.05 0.15 0.11 0.22 0.20 0.23 −0.11  −0.08  −0.05 
Duration 1 −0.22 −0.03 −0.07 −0.17 0.39*  −0.26  −0.07  −0.18  −0.19 
Abstinence 1 −0.07 0.28 0.15 0.06 0.09 0.18 0.15 0.10
IGT 1 0.25 −0.08 −0.16  −0.21  −0.09  −0.01  0.01
IGT 2 1 0.13 −0.09  0.11 −0.24  0.04 −0.08 
Logk_10_1 1 0.75** 0.83** 0.43* 0.42* 0.41*
Logk_30_1 1 0.82** 0.52** 0.50** 0.54**
Logk_100_1 1 0.32 0.40* 0.41*
Logk_10_2 1 0.81** 0.87**
Logk_30_2 1 0.89**
Logk_100_2 1

Duration, years of substance dependence; Abstinence, days of abstinence; IGT, Iowa Gambling Task net score after 2 weeks of treatment; IGT 2, Iowa Gambling Tasks net scores after 6 weeks of treatment; logk_10/30/100_1, outcome measures Delay Discounting Task after 2 weeks of treatment; logk_10/30/100_2, outcome measures Delay Discounting Task after 6 weeks of treatment. The numbers in bold show the significant correlations (*p < 0.050; **p < 0.005).