Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 1;56(1):21–27.

Table 2. Morphological findings on coronal reconstructed CT images.

OP group [n = 19] Non-VS group [n = 70] VS group [n = 10] P value
Odontoid height (mm) 31.9 (27.6–35.5) 32.2 (27.1–38.9) 29.7 (27.4–32.0) 0.236
LMH(C1) (mm) L 11.1 (7.5–15.2) 9.4 (6.1–14.5) 7.5 (4.1–10.5) 0.075
R 10.9 (7.0–13.7) 9.7 (6.4–15.7) 7.1 (3.1–10.4) 0.075
LMH(C2) (mm) L 12.2 (9.8–14.1) 12.6 (9.4–17.0) 9.4 (3.8–13.8) 0.001
R 12.7 (10.9–15.7) 12.9 (10.6–16.8) 9.8 (8.4–13.0) 0.001
FA(C1) (°) L 59.3 (47.8–70.0) 55.6 (35.2–71.4) 49.7 (42.1–58.0) 0.075
R 63.5 (51.3–76.5) 54.8 (33.6–75.7) 41.7 (8.5–58.5) 0.013
FA(C2) (°) L 22.6 (17.2–28.9) 21.1 (11.1–31.3) 21.3 (14.0–29.7) 0.658
R 24.2 (16.8–31.1) 21.3 (11.6–34.8) 20.8 (9.3–27.0) 0.286
AOJ changes Normal L 15 (78.6) 35 (50.0) 1 (10.0)
R 15 (78.6) 35 (50.0) 1 (10.0)
Erosive L 4 (21.4) 30 (42.9) 6 (60.0) L: < 0.001
R 4 (21.4) 30 (42.9) 4 (40.0) R: < 0.001
Ankylosing L 0 (0.0) 5 (7.1) 3 (30.0)
R 0 (0.0) 5 (7.1) 5 (50.0)
AAJ changes Normal L 17 (89.5) 38 (54.3) 1 (10.0)
R 16 (64.2) 34 (48.6) 2 (20.0)
Erosive L 2 (10.5) 27 (38.6) 5 (50.0) L: < 0.001
R 2 (10.5) 31 (44.3) 3 (30.0) R: < 0.001
Ankylosing L 0 (0.0) 5 (7.1) 4 (40.0)
R 1 (5.3) 5 (7.1) 5 (50.0)
Bone defects in the odontoid process Spot 9 (47.4) 34 (48.6) 0 (0.0) < 0.001
Small 5 (26.3) 31 (44.3) 6 (60.0)
Large 5 (26.3) 5 (7.1) 4 (40.0)

Data of parameters are expressed as means (range) and non-parametrical data are expressed as the number of patients (%).

AAJ, atlantoaxial joint; AOJ, atlanto-occipital joint; CT, computed tomography; FA, facet angle; L, left; LMH, lateral mass height; NS, not significant; OP, postmenopausal osteoporosis; R, right; VS, vertical subluxation.

Mann-Whitney’s U test was used to compare between non-VS and VS groups. Pearson’s chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test, when appropriate, was employed for comparisons.

P values were derived by the comparison between non-VS and VS groups.