Table 1.
Study | Patients | Patient eligibility: (1) STEMI type; (2) Presentation time (3) TIMI flow (4) Rentrop | Ischaemic time (min); AAR (%LV) | IPost protocol | Outcome measures | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Staat et al. (2005)13 | 30 | LAD/RCA STEMI | 331 C | Four 60-s inflations/deflations | 36%↓ in 72 h AUC CK | First application of IPost in STEMI patients |
<6 h | 318 IPost | 34% ↓ in peak CK | ||||
TIMI 0 flow | 34% C | MBG ↑ 1.7 to 2.4 | ||||
Rentrop <1 | 37% IPost | |||||
Laskey et al. (2005)52 | 17 | All STEMI | 286 C | Two cycles of 1.5 min inflation/3–5 min deflations | Improved coronary blood flow | |
NA | 341 IPost | Better ST-segment resolution | ||||
All TIMI flow | NA | |||||
Collaterals included | ||||||
Ma et al. (2006)53 | 94 | All STEMI | 426 C | Three 30-s inflations/deflations | 28% ↓ peak C | |
<12 h | 395 IPost | 32% ↓ peak CK-MB | ||||
All TIMI flow | NA | ↓ serum MDA | ||||
Collaterals included | Improved coronary blood flow | |||||
Better endothelial function | ||||||
Better WMSI at 8 weeks | ||||||
Yang et al. (2007)54 | 41 | All STEMI | 264 C | Three 30-s inflations/deflations | 27% ↓ 72 h AUC total CK | First study to show ↓ MI size by imaging |
NA | 312 IPost | 27% ↓ MI size at 7 days by SPECT | ||||
TIMI 0 flow | NA | |||||
Rentrop <1 | ||||||
Laskey et al. (2008)55 | 24 | LAD STEMI | 222 C | Two cycles of 1.5 min inflation/4–5 min deflations | 19% ↓ peak total CK level | |
<6 h | 228 IPost | Improved coronary flow velocity reserve | ||||
TIMI 0–1 flow | NA | Better ST-segment resolution | ||||
No collateral flow | ||||||
Thibault et al. (2008)56 | 38 | LAD/RCA STEMI | 297 C | Four 60-s inflations/deflations | 40% ↓ 72 h AUC CK | First study to demonstrate long-term cardioprotection with IPost |
<6 h | 283 IPost | 41% ↓ 72 h AUC CK-MB | ||||
TIMI 0 flow | 39% C | 39% ↓ MI size at 6 months by SPECT | ||||
Rentrop <1 | 40% IPost | 7% ↑ EF by echo at 1 year | ||||
Zhao et al. (2009)57 | 75 | All STEMI | 268 C | Three 30-s or 60 s inflations/deflations | ↓ in plasma apoptotic marker sFas | Three 60-s IPost protocol more effective |
<6 h | 288 IPost | |||||
TIMI 0–1 flow | ||||||
Rentrop <2 | ||||||
Lonborg et al. (2010)58 | 118 | All STEMI | 255 C | Four 30-s inflations/deflations | No difference in troponin T or LVEF | Largest IPost study to date |
<12 h | 241 IPost | 19% ↓ MI size at 3 months by CMR | First to use CMR to assess IPost | |||
TIMI 0 flow | 29% C | 31% ↑ in myocardial salvage index | ||||
Collaterals included | 29% IPost | Less heart failure (27% vs. 46%) | ||||
Xue et al. (2010)59 | 43 | All STEMI | 324 C | Four 60-s inflations/deflations | Better ST-segment resolution | |
<12 h | 246 IPost | 26% ↓ 72 h AUC CK-MB | ||||
TIMI 0 flow | 46% ↓ in MI size at 7 days by SPECT | |||||
Rentrop <2 | ↓ levels of hs-C-reactive protein | |||||
10% ↑ in EF | ||||||
Lin et al. (2010)60 | 74 | All STEMI | NA | Three 30-s or 60 s inflations/deflations | ↑ in EF and WMSI at 1 year | Three 60-s IPost protocol more effective |
<12 h | ↓ levels of tumour necrosis factor α | |||||
TIMI 0 flow | ||||||
Rentrop <2 | ||||||
Fan et al. (2010)61 | 50 | All STEMI | 268 C | Three 30-s inflations/deflations | ↓ inducible nitric oxide synthase activity in white blood cells | |
NA | 288 IPost | Decreased plasma nitrotyrosine | ||||
TIMI 0–1 flow | Improved cardiac function | |||||
Rentrop <2 | ||||||
Sorensson et al. (2010)17 | 76 | All STEMI | 185 C | Four 60-s inflations/deflations | No difference in 48 h AUC CK-MB and troponin T | First negative study, although IPost effective in those patients with large AAR (>30%) or LAD infarcts |
<6 h | 165 IPost | No difference in myocardial salvage by CMR at day 7–9 | ||||
TIMI 0 flow | 23% C | Significant increase in myocardial salvage in patients with large AAR (>30% of LV) | ||||
Rentrop <2 | 30% IPost | |||||
Garcia et al. (2010)62 | 43 | All STEMI | 270 C | Four 30-s inflations/deflations | 11% ↓ peak CK | |
<12 h | 270 IPost | 20% ↓ peak CK-MB | ||||
TIMI 0 flow | Increased MBG | |||||
Rentrop <1 | 9% ↑ in EF | |||||
Limalanathan et al. (2010) 63POSTEMI | All STEMI | Four 60-s inflations/deflations | Ongoing | |||
<6 h | ||||||
TIMI 0 flow | ||||||
Rentrop <1 | ||||||
Tarantini et al. (2010)64 (POST-AMI) | 78 | All STEMI | NA | Four 60-s inflations/deflations | Ongoing | |
<6 h | Endpoints include AUC or peak troponin I | |||||
TIMI 0 flow | MI size at 30 d by CMR with IPost | |||||
Rentrop <1 | ||||||
Engstrom et al. (DANAMI-3) | 2000 | All STEMI | NA | Four 30-s inflations/deflations | Ongoing | Large outcome-based study |
<12 h | Primary combined endpoint is cardiac death, re-infarction, and heart failure at 3 years | |||||
Ovize et al. (PRIME) | 72 | LAD/RCA STEMI | NA | Four 60-s inflations/deflations | Ongoing | Tests if IPost is effective in patients who spontaneously reperfuse |
<12 h | Primary endpoint is MI size by CMR at 5 d | |||||
TIMI 2–3 flow | ||||||
Rentrop <1 |
AUC, area under the curve; AAR, area at risk; C, control; CK, creatine kinase; CMR, cardiac MRI; EF, ejection fraction; IPost, ischaemic postconditioning; LAD, left anterior descending coronary artery; LV, left ventricular; MBG, myocardial blush grade; MDA, malondialdehyde; MI, myocardial infarct; RCA, right coronary artery; SPECT, single photon emission CT; STEMI, ST-segment elevation MI; TIMI, thrombolysis in myocardial infarction; WMSI, wall motion score index.