Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychooncology. 2011 Oct 3;22(1):195–202. doi: 10.1002/pon.2073

Table 3.

Summary for hierarchical regression analysis for social context variables predicting posttraumatic growth

Variable B SE β t ∆R2 Step
Step 1 .13*
Type of transplant 15.18 5.70 .36 2.67*
Step 2 .09*
Type of transplant 13.19 5.52 .32 2.39*
Instrumental supporta 10.08 4.37 .30 2.31*
Step 3 .01
Type of transplant 11.95 5.77 .29 2.07*
Instrumental supporta 8.85 4.66 .27 1.90
Emotional supporta 3.60 4.65 .11 .77
Step 4 .02
Type of transplant 10.80 5.90 .26 1.83
Instrumental supporta 9.68 4.74 .29 2.04*
Emotional supporta 3.72 4.66 .12 .80
Social constraint −.48 .49 −.13 −.97
Total R2 .25*

Note. N = 49; Transplant type: 0 = autologous, 1 = allogeneic; B/β, unstandardized/ standardized regression coefficient; ∆R2, change in explained variance; Total R2, total explained variance;

a

Indicates a square-root transformation was performed on reflected total scores

*

p < .05

p < .10