Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Aug 30.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Pharm. 2012 Aug 25;453(1):198–214. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2012.08.042

Table 3.

A comparison of nanocrystal-, nanoemulsion- and polymeric micelle-based nanonization approaches for delivery of poorly water-soluble compounds

Approach Advantages Disadvantages
Polymeric micelles
  • Improved controlled release functions

  • Multifunctional design possible

  • Suitable for intravenous administration

  • Lack of stability in blood

  • Limited number of polymers for use

  • Lack of suitable methods for scale-up

Nanocrystal
  • Well-understood and established manufacturing techniques

  • Excellent reproducibility

  • Applicable to drugs with different solubility profiles

  • Suitable for oral administration

  • Requires high energy input that drives up cost

  • Needs further modification to ensure stability

  • Lack of controlled release functions

Nanoemulsion
  • Low cost of production

  • Suitable for various routes of administration

  • High drug loading achievable

  • Tendency to flocculate and coalescent

  • Lack of stability in blood

  • Lack of controlled release functions