Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 3.
Published in final edited form as: Ecology. 2012 Apr;93(4):803–814. doi: 10.1890/11-0967.1

Table 2.

Results for a GLMM with seed set of focal and hand-pollinated field and greenhouse flowers of Tradescantia ohiensis as the response variable and pollinator taxa and hand-pollination as predictor variables.

Effects Estimate SE/SD z P N
Fixed
  Hand pollination 1.21 0.083 440
  Bombus spp. −1.54 0.46 56
  Augochlorella sp. 0.17 0.71 20
    Ceratina dupla 0.0028 0.44 78
    Toxomerus geminatus −2.51 0.92 42
  Dialictus sp. large −2.80 1.48 15
  Week × hand pollination 0.049 0.024 2.03 0.043
  Week × Bombus spp. 0.44 0.12 3.49 0.0005
  Week × Augochlorella sp. 0.056 0.16 0.35 0.73
  Week × Ceratina dupla −0.048 0.18 −0.27 0.79
  Week × Toxomerus geminatus 0.42 0.21 1.98 0.047
  Week × Dialictus sp. large 0.65 0.33 1.96 0.050
Random
  Individual plant 0.30 <0.0001 283
  Date 0 1 18

Notes: The interaction between week and hand pollination gives the slope for hand pollinations, and the interactions between pollinator taxa and week test whether the slope for each pollinator differs from the slope for hand pollinations. The z scores and P values are not given for the main effects because we are not interested in hypotheses regarding these terms. Coefficients are on a log scale because seed set was assumed to be Poisson distributed.

SE for fixed effects, SD for random effects.