Table 3.
Generalized estimating equations estimates of percent FECa on PTH, SCa, and insulin by meal period
| Fast |
Fed |
Both |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | IH | N | IH | N | IH | |
| PTH (per 5) | 0.01 (−0.11, 0.14) | −0.14*(−0.21, −0.06) | −0.02 (−0.27, 0.23) | −0.21 (−0.42, 0.00) | 0.03 (−0.16, 0.21) | −0.21*(−0.36, −0.05) |
| SCa (per 0.05 mMol) | −0.01 (−0.14, 0.13) | 0.20 (0.03, 0.36) | 0.10 (−0.12, 0.31) | 0.38(0.06, 0.70) | 0.05 (−0.13, 0.24) | 0.37 (0.09, 0.66) |
| Serum insulin (per 100) | −1.17 (−2.43, 0.09) | 0.27 (−0.85, 1.39) | 0.01 (−0.17, 0.19) | 0.06 (−0.07, 0.19) | −0.08 (−0.25, 0.09) | 0.08 (−0.04, 0.20) |
Values are percent change in FECa relative to the change specified for the independent variable (PTH, SCa, serum insulin) with 95% CI in parentheses. Analysis over both fasting and fed periods adjust for feeding. Underline: slope in IH is significant and that the 95% CI for the effect in IH does not contain the estimated value in N. Italics: P < 0.05 vs. 0.
*
P < 0.05, slopes differ between IH and N in generalized estimating equations analysis.