Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 17.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2013 Jul 9;135(28):10326–10329. doi: 10.1021/ja4055492

Table 1. Screening of Iodination Conditionsa.

graphic file with name nihms-504176-t0005.jpg

entry Pd (II)b basec solventd yield (%)e
1 Pd(OAc)2 DMF 15
2 Pd(OAc)2 CsOAc DMF 62
3 Pd(OAc)2 CsOAc t-AmylOH <5
4 Pd(OAc)2 CsOAc DMF/t-AmylOH 80
5 Pd(OAc)2 CsOAc/NaHCO3f DMF/t-AmylOH 99
6 Pd(OAc)2 NaHCO3f DMF/t-AmylOH 35
7g Pd(OAc)2 CsOAc/NaHCO3f DMF/t-AmylOH 98 (95%h)
8 CsOAc/NaHCO3f DMF/t-AmylOH 0
9 PdCl2 CsOAc/NaHCO3f DMF/t-AmylOH 83
10 PdI2 CsOAc/NaHCO3f DMF/t-AmylOH 75
11 PdI2 DMF/t-AmylOH <5
a

The reactions were run on 0.10 mmol scale in a 25 mL-sealed tube under aira.

b

5 mol % of the Pd(II) catalyst was used unless otherwise stated.

c

1.2 eq of CsOAc was used.

d

Solvent volume = 2.0 mL; DMF/t-AmylOH = 1:1.

e

% yield was determined e by the 1H NMR spectroscopy using CH2Br2 as the internal standard.

f

1.0 eq of NaHCO3 was added.

g

The reaction was run on 0.30 mmol scale with 2 mol % Pd(OAc)2 in 5.0 mL of solvent.

h

Yield of the isolated product.