Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Oct 12.
Published in final edited form as: J Health Psychol. 2013 Apr 12;19(7):821–835. doi: 10.1177/1359105313479812

Table 3.

Logistic regressions of Unsafe sex conflict and expectancies predicting the percentage of men engaging in high-risk sex under the influence (N = 107).

Step 1 Step 2
Model χ2 21.55*** 26.57***
df 2 3
Nagelkerke R2 0.251 0.302
95% CI
95% CI
β Exp(B) Lower Upper p value β Exp(B) Lower Upper p value
Constant −0.895 0.409 <.001 −1.02 0.36 <.001
Conflict (low vs high) 1.39 4.02 1.5 10.76 .006 1.4 4.05 1.39 11.79 .01
Expectancies (low vs high) 1.29 3.65 1.47 9.06 .005 0.862 2.37 0.815 6.889 .113
Conflict × expectancies interaction 2.33 10.29 1.22 87.04 .032
Likelihood ratio χ2(2) = 21.55*** Likelihood ratio χstep(1)2=5.02*
Likelihood ratio χmodel(3)2=26.57***

CI: confidence interval.

*

p < .05,

**

p < .01,

***

p < .001.