Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cortex. 2013 Feb 19;49(10):10.1016/j.cortex.2013.02.009. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2013.02.009

Table 1.

Characteristics of subjects with WAGR Syndrome, isolated aniridia, and healthy controls. Mean ± standard deviation (range) or percentage shown.

WAGR Syndrome (n=28) Isolated Aniridia (n=12) Healthy Controls (n=20) P-Values
Overall WAGR vs. Aniridia WAGR vs. Healthy Aniridia vs. Healthy
Age (y) 14.8 ± 7.5 (6.1–28.3) 28.9 ± 13.4 (7.3–54.0) 15.3 ± 7.3 (4.1–32.8) <.001 <.001 1.00 <.001
Sex (% Female) 60.7 50.0 60.0 .81 .73 1.00 .72
Race/Ethnicity (%) .26 .74 .15 .32
Non-Hispanic Caucasian 89.2 91.7 60.0
Hispanic Caucasian 3.6 0 5.0
African American 0 0 10.0
Asian 3.6 0 15.0
Mixed Race 3.6 8.3 10.0
Visual Acuity Score 4.3 ± 1.3 (2–7) 4.0 ± 1.4 (2–7) all = 1.0 <.001 .53 <.001 <.001
Vineland Adaptive Behaviour Composite Score 62 ± 16 (20–90)
(n=28)
81 ± 19 (37–99)
(n=8)
105 ± 7 (91–117)
(n=13)
<.001 .009 <.001 .002
Composite IQ/DQ 58 ± 24 (16–121)
(n=24)
101 ± 11 (86–117)
(n=10)
113 ± 13 (92–138)
(n=20)
<.001 <.001 <.001 .29