Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 4.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Prev Med. 2012 Dec;43(6 0 5):S457–S463. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.08.011

Table 1.

Description of PEDS and M-CHAT screening outcomes and referral examplesa

Screening outcomeb Description of concerns Typical referrals
PEDS Path A
 High risk of developmental disability
Multiple developmental and frequent behavioral concerns Further evaluation
Specialty referrals if warranted (medical, mental health)
Early intervention (age 0 –2 years) or early childhood special education (age 3–5 years)
PEDS Path B
 Moderate risk of developmental disability
At least one developmental concern and other behavioral concerns Further evaluation if warranted
Early intervention or early childhood program
PEDS Path C
 Elevated risk for behavioral or mental health problems
Behavioral or mental health concerns but no developmental concerns Further evaluation if warranted
Specialty referrals if warranted (medical, mental health)
Early intervention program
PEDS Path E
 Low risk of developmental disability
No concerns of any type Early childhood program such as Head Start
Annual rescreening
M-CHAT: Fail Shows possible signs of an autism spectrum disorder Refer to state’s developmental disability regional center for autism diagnostic evaluation
Follow PEDS referral pathway per developmental screening results
M-CHAT: Pass No signs of an autism spectrum disorder. Other developmental concerns may still be present. Follow PEDS referral pathway per developmental screening results
a

As a standard, all referrals included vision, hearing, and lead screening as well as recommendation of early childhood education programs.

b

Oral administration of the PEDS eliminates use of Path D which records questionable results for parents who have difficulty understanding the printed version of the PEDS.

PEDS, Parents’ Evaluation of Developmental Status; M-CHAT, Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers