Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 4.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Prev Med. 2012 Dec;43(6 0 5):S457–S463. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.08.011

Table 3.

PEDS and M-CHAT screening and referral outcomes by level of risk, %a

Identified risk Linked to services Pending services Referred for annual rescreen Otherc
PEDS (n=2845)
 High developmental risk: Path A (n=803) 28.2 45.2 33.9 <1 20.5
 Moderate developmental risk: Path B (n=782) 27.5 47.6 34.4 <1 17.4
 Very low developmental risk: Path E (n=797) 28.0 1.2 <1 97.9 <1
 Behavioral/mental health risk: Path C (n=463) 16.3 23.5 11.2 59.8 5.5
M-CHAT (n=1605)b
 Risk for autism: fail (n=341) 21.2 51 23.2 5.3 20.5
 Limited risk for autism: pass (n=1264) 78.8
a

Refer to Methods for complete description of outcomes.

b

Overlap exists between the M-CHAT and PEDS pathways, because referrals were made according to PEDS pathway protocols in conjunction with M-CHAT results. M-CHAT Fail results are broken out independently for reporting purposes only.

c

“Other” included families who could not be reached after several attempts or whose records were missing data.

PEDS, Parents’ Evaluation of Developmental Status; M-CHAT, Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers