Table 1.
Performance of teachers and students on the K–4 field testsa
| Students | Teachers | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Test | Items | n | Mean | SD | KR20 | Anchor | ∆ | n | Mean | SD | Core |
| 101 | 23 | 349 | 0.69 | 0.17 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.01 | 7 | 0.91 | 0.16 | 0.80 |
| 102 | 22 | 292 | 0.55 | 0.17 | 0.72 | 0.61 | −0.08 | 4 | 0.95 | 0.09 | 0.95 |
| 103 | 22 | 165 | 0.69 | 0.15 | 0.66 | 0.74 | 0.04 | 1 | 0.95 | nc | 0.95 |
| 104 | 24 | 218 | 0.63 | 0.14 | 0.61 | 0.71 | 0.02 | 4 | 0.95 | 0.02 | 0.95 |
| 105 | 21 | 263 | 0.69 | 0.17 | 0.71 | 0.67 | −0.02 | 5 | 0.94 | 0.04 | 0.94 |
| 106 | 22 | 368 | 0.63 | 0.18 | 0.75 | 0.66 | −0.03 | 6 | 0.97 | 0.02 | 0.97 |
| 107 | 22 | 462 | 0.63 | 0.15 | 0.66 | 0.68 | −0.01 | 6 | 0.89 | 0.06 | 0.89 |
| 108 | 20 | 233 | 0.65 | 0.17 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.01 | 5 | 0.95 | 0.06 | 0.95 |
| 109 | 22 | 162 | 0.60 | 0.13 | 0.59 | 0.70 | 0.01 | 2 | 0.89 | 0.03 | 0.89 |
| 110 | 20 | 327 | 0.65 | 0.17 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.04 | 5 | 0.96 | 0.02 | 0.80 |
| 111 | 20 | 207 | 0.67 | 0.16 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.02 | 4 | 0.95 | 0.04 | 0.95 |
| 112 | 19 | 224 | 0.62 | 0.17 | 0.69 | 0.66 | −0.03 | 3 | 0.96 | 0.06 | 0.96 |
| 113 | 21 | 272 | 0.70 | 0.15 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.03 | 5 | 0.95 | 0.06 | 0.95 |
| 114 | 20 | 304 | 0.62 | 0.20 | 0.77 | 0.66 | −0.03 | 7 | 0.93 | 0.06 | 0.93 |
| 115 | 23 | 379 | 0.72 | 0.14 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.04 | 9 | 0.97 | 0.04 | 0.97 |
| Core | 6 | 4225 | 0.65 | 0.17 | 0.41 | 0.69 | 0.00 | 73 | 0.94 | 0.07 | 0.97 |
aThis table summarizes the 15 field tests involving 4225 students of 73 teachers. The student mean scores on each test range from 0.55 to 0.72. The measure of internal consistency, KR20, is 0.59 or higher for each student test. Teachers’ mean scores are much higher than those of students, as expected. Subsample performance based on anchor (core) items allows for a test form difficulty correction (∆) to be calculated. nc = not calculated.