Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 20;63(4):260–267. doi: 10.1007/s13224-012-0344-4

Table 2.

Comparison of labor characteristics between the three parity groups

Variable Group 1 (n = 1658) % Group 2 (n = 1198) % Group 3 (n = 160) % RRa (95 % CI) P value RRb (95 % CI) P value RRc (95 % CI) P value
Induction of labor 56 (3.37) 98 (8.18) 6 (3.75) 2.42 (1.75–3.33) 0.0001*** 1.10 (0.50–2.39) 0.80 0.46 (0.21–1.03) 0.04*
Labor augmentation 99 (5.97) 32 (2.67) 2 (1.25) 0.44 (0.30–0.66) 0.0001*** 0.21 (0.05–0.85) 0.01* 0.49 (0.12–1.90) 0.27
Meconium stained liquor 152 (9.16) 128 (10.68) 17 (10.62) 1.16 (0.93–1.45) 0.17 1.16 (0.71–1.86) 0.54 0.99 (0.62–1.59) 0.98
CTG abnormalities in labor 87 (5.24) 91 (7.59) 6 (3.75) 1.44 (1.08–1.92) 0.01* 0.72 (0.32–1.58) 0.41 0.50 (0.23–1.11) 0.07
Preterm delivery 43 (2.59) 63 (5.25) 14 (8.75) 2.02 (1.38–2.96) 0.0002*** 2.96 (1.83–4.79) 0.0001*** 1.59 (0.96–2.62) 0.07
Post-term delivery 48 (2.89) 128 (10.68) 5 (3.12) 3.69 (2.67–5.09) 0.0001*** 1.07 (0.46–2.50) 0.86 0.29 (0.12–0.71) 0.002**

* Statistically significant result; ** Statistically highly significant result; *** Statistically very highly significant result

aComparison between Groups 1 & 2

bComparison between Groups 1 & 3

cComparison between Groups 2 & 3