Skip to main content
. 2010 Feb;198(2):143–158. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.2009.02055.x

Table 3.

Occurrence of arrhythmogenesis (AT or AF) under different protocols

Agents Intrinsic (n) Regular pacing (10 Hz) (n) PES (n)
Control 0 (36) 0 (36) 3 (36)
FPL 3 (7)** 4 (7)** 7 (7)**
Nifedipine pre-treated 0 (12)* 0 (12)* 3 (12)##
CPA pre-treated 20 min 0 (11)* 0 (11)* 1 (11)***
Caffeine pre-treated >15 min 0 (6)* 0 (6)* 0 (6)***
Nifedipine + FPL 0 (6)* 0 (6)* 5 (6)**
CPA + FPL 0 (6)* 0 (6)* 4 (6)**
Caffeine + FPL 0 (6)* 0 (6)* 1 (6)##

AT, atrial tachycardia; AF, atrial fibrillation; CPA, cyclopiazonic acid; PES, programmed electrical stimulation.

Test agents vs. control P < 0.01**; test agents vs. FPL P < 0.05*; test agents vs. FPL P < 0.01## and P < 0.001*** on Fisher exact testing. Each entry provides both the incidence of arrhythmogenesis and the number of hearts studied in brackets.