Table 4.
Compliance of intervention and training diary. All data are presented as mean (standard deviation).
| Intervention group | Control group | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All (n = 11) | Female (n = 5) | All (n = 9) | Female (n = 7) | ||||||
| Compliance of strength (%) | 76 | (9) | 79 | (9) | |||||
| Compliance of endurance (%) | 86 | (8) | 90 | (4) | |||||
| Training volume (meters ∙ 1000) | In total | 256.2 | (40.7) | 258.4 | (40.9) | 244.0 | (52.0)7 | 227.8 | (51.7)5 |
| 60-85% of HRmax | 122.4 | (47.0) | 104.8 | (51.1) | 122.2 | (75.9)7 | 120.2 | (53.3)5 | |
| 85-95% of HRmax | 90.0 | (23.3) | 99.2 | (9.2) | 49.2 | (39.7)7 | 57.1 | (44.8)5 | |
| >95% of HRmax | 27.0 | (14.7) | 36.8 | (13.2)† | 16.7 | (9.7)7 | 15.9 | (9.6)5† | |
| Alternative training (min) | 961 | (709)9 | 995 | (600) | 1092 | (636)7 | 1144 | (686)4 | |
7 include 7 subjects, 5 include 5 subjects, HRmax: maximal heart rate, 9 include 9 subjects, 4 include 4 subjects, min: minutes. † Significant difference between groups at p < 0.05.