Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 19;41(16):e160. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt617

Table 7.

Comparison between DBSI and several other DNA-binding site prediction methods on the TEST-206 data set

Method Sensitivity Specificity Precision Accuracy F1 Strength MCC
DBSI 0.74 0.85 0.49 0.84 0.59 0.80 0.51
DISPLAR 0.55 0.89 0.48 0.83 0.51 0.72 0.42
BindN 0.46 0.76 0.27 0.72 0.34 0.61 0.18
BindN-rf 0.56 0.83 0.38 0.79 0.45 0.69 0.34
DBS-PRED 0.46 0.73 0.25 0.69 0.32 0.60 0.16
DNABindR 0.60 0.72 0.29 0.70 0.39 0.66 0.25
DP-Bind 0.63 0.80 0.37 0.77 0.47 0.71 0.35
metaDBsite 0.54 0.80 0.34 0.76 0.42 0.67 0.29
DBSI 0–30% 0.68 0.84 0.43 0.82 0.53 0.76 0.44
DBSI 30–60% 0.81 0.87 0.58 0.86 0.68 0.84 0.61
DBSI 60–100% 0.76 0.86 0.51 0.85 0.61 0.81 0.54
DISPLAR 0–30% 0.50 0.89 0.45 0.83 0.47 0.70 0.38
DISPLAR 30–60% 0.65 0.88 0.55 0.84 0.59 0.76 0.50
DISPLAR 60–100% 0.56 0.89 0.49 0.84 0.52 0.73 0.43
DP-Bind 0–30% 0.62 0.79 0.33 0.76 0.43 0.70 0.32
DP-Bind 30–60% 0.69 0.79 0.41 0.77 0.51 0.74 0.40
DP-Bind 60–100% 0.62 0.82 0.39 0.79 0.48 0.72 0.37

In addition, we compare DBSI, DISPLAR and DP-Bind on three subsets of the TEST-206 data. Proteins in these subsets have homology in the ranges 0–30, 30–60 and 60–100% to examples the TRAIN-263 data set.