Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 5.
Published in final edited form as: Attach Hum Dev. 2010 Jan;12(0):3–141. doi: 10.1080/14616730903338985

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Illustrations of Infant Self- and Interactive Contingencies Defined by Time-Series Analysis.

Note. To calculate infant self-contingency, second 4 in the infant’s stream of behavior identifies t0, the predicted second. A weighted average of seconds t-1, t-2, and t-3 in the infant’s behavioral stream identify the “weighted lag,” which is used to predict t0. To calculate infant interactive contingency, a weighted average of seconds t-1, t-2, and t-3 in the mother’s behavioral stream is used to predict t0 in the infant’s behavioral stream. For both self- and interactive contingency, this is an iterative process in which second 5 will then identify the new t0, and seconds 2, 3, and 4 will identify the new “weighted lag.” A parallel diagram would depict mother self- and interactive contingency.