Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 5.

Published in final edited form as: Attach Hum Dev. 2010 Jan;12(0):3–141. doi: 10.1080/14616730903338985

Self- and Interactive Contingency in Secure (B) and Insecure (nonB) Dyads (see Table 5).

Note. ^a Domains: attention (pattern 1), emotion (2, 3, 4), mother touch (5, 6, 7), orientation (8) and infant intrapersonal (9)

^f M Touch ↓ = less positive in nonB (vs. B).

^g I Touch ↓ = less frequent in nonB (vs. B).

^h M loom ↑ = higher in nonB (vs. B); chase and dodge ↑ = higher in nonB (vs. B).

graphic file with name nihms483400u1.jpg — Self- and Interactive Contingency in Secure (B) and Insecure (nonB) Dyads (see Table 5).

Note. ^a Domains: attention (pattern 1), emotion (2, 3, 4), mother touch (5, 6, 7), orientation (8) and infant intrapersonal (9)

^f M Touch ↓ = less positive in nonB (vs. B).

^g I Touch ↓ = less frequent in nonB (vs. B).

^h M loom ↑ = higher in nonB (vs. B); chase and dodge ↑ = higher in nonB (vs. B).