Skip to main content
. 2013 Oct;5(5):245–253. doi: 10.1177/1756287213498923

Table 1.

Outcomes from HoLEP versus M-TURP randomized, controlled trials.

Post-op Irrigation
Transfusion (%)
Catheter time (h)
Hospital stay (h)
IPSS (% change)
Qmax (% change)
PVR (% change)
HoLEP TURP HoLEP TURP HoLEP TURP HoLEP TURP HoLEP TURP HoLEP TURP HoLEP TURP
Tan et al. [2003] 7% 70% 0 3 17.7 44.9 27.6 49.9 83 79 160 122 70 59
Kuntz et al. [2004] N/A 0 2 27.6 43.4 53.3 85.8 92 82 469 369 98 88
Montorsi et al. [2004] N/A 0 2 31.0 57.8 59.0 85.8 81 82 206 217 N/A
Gupta et al. [2006] 4.2 l 9.1 l 0 2 28.6 45.7 N/A 78 76 387 427 82 76
Mavuduru et al. [2009] 19 h 30 h 0 7 46.4 78.2 N/A 81 84 393 302 53 65

HoLEP, holmium laser enucleation; IPSS, international prostate symptom score; N/A, not applicable; PVR, postvoid residual volume; TURP, transurethral resection of the prostate