Table I.
Case | GK | Kernel (K) P2K | P1K | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LIKE | BHM | BHM (BF) | LIKE | BHM | BHM (BF) | LIKE | BHM | BHM (BF) | |||
n = 60 p = 5 |
Type I Power | 0 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.05 |
1 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 1 | 0.97 | 0.98 | 1 | 0.97 | 0.98 | 1 | ||
2 | 0.90 | 0.94 | 0.97 | 0.85 | 0.86 | 0.89 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.70 | ||
3 | 0.86 | 0.89 | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.93 | 0.95 | 0.86 | 0.87 | 0.89 | ||
4 | 0.84 | 0.86 | 0.89 | 0.77 | 0.80 | 0.82 | 0.92 | 0.93 | 0.95 | ||
5 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.81 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.78 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.77 | ||
n = 60 p = 200 |
Type I Power | 0 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.04 |
1 | 0.84 | 0.85 | 0.89 | 0.83 | 0.85 | 0.89 | 0.82 | 0.83 | 0.87 | ||
2 | 0.81 | 0.82 | 0.87 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.81 | 0.56 | 0.60 | 0.61 | ||
3 | 0.77 | 0.79 | 0.81 | 0.80 | 0.82 | 0.84 | 0.74 | 0.79 | 0.79 | ||
4 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 0.63 | 0.64 | 0.66 | 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.88 | ||
5 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.75 |
LIKE = LLG’s likelihood-based approach with kernel K by using a resampling-based inference; BHM = Bayesian approach on hierarchical model by using a resampling-based inference; BHM (BF) = Bayesian approach on hierarchical model by using an inference based on the Bayes factor; GK = Gaussian kernel; P2K = quadratic kernel; P1K = linear kernel.