Table II.
K | Method | Case | β | σ | τ | ρ | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n = 60 p = 5 |
GK | LIKE | 2 | cvpr ×100 | 97 | 96 | 91 | 90 |
MSE | 0.0053 | 0.0247 | 0.0483 | 0.0623 | ||||
BHM | cvpr ×100 | 98 | 96 | 93 | 91 | |||
MSE | 0.0044 | 0.0149 | 0.0295 | 0.0452 | ||||
P2K | LIKE | 3 | cvpr ×100 | 98 | 93 | 95 | N/A | |
MSE | 0.0053 | 0.0485 | 0.0252 | N/A | ||||
BHM | cvpr ×100 | 98 | 94 | 96 | N/A | |||
MSE | 0.0050 | 0.0478 | 0.0224 | N/A | ||||
P1K | LIKE | 4 | cvpr ×100 | 97 | 93 | 95 | N/A | |
MSE | 0.0051 | 0.0104 | 0.0165 | N/A | ||||
BHM | cvpr ×100 | 97 | 93 | 95 | N/A | |||
MSE | 0.0043 | 0.0089 | 0.0132 | N/A | ||||
n = 60 p = 200 |
GK | LIKE | 2 | cvpr ×100 | 89 | 87 | 87 | 80 |
MSE | 0.0321 | 0.0436 | 0.0424 | 0.1261 | ||||
BHM | cvpr ×100 | 89 | 89 | 88 | 81 | |||
MSE | 0.0282 | 0.0264 | 0.0372 | 0.1095 | ||||
P2K | LIKE | 3 | cvpr ×100 | 86 | 63 | 87 | N/A | |
MSE | 0.0478 | 0.4683 | 0.0388 | N/A | ||||
BHM | cvpr ×100 | 86 | 64 | 88 | N/A | |||
MSE | 0.0461 | 0.4368 | 0.0313 | N/A | ||||
P1K | LIKE | 4 | cvpr ×100 | 86 | 65 | 82 | N/A | |
MSE | 0.0486 | 0.2984 | 0.0583 | N/A | ||||
BHM | cvpr ×100 | 87 | 67 | 85 | N/A | |||
MSE | 0.0381 | 0.2328 | 0.0550 | N/A |
LIKE = LLG’s likelihood-based approach with kernel K; BHM = Bayesian approach on hierarchical model with kernel K; GK = Gaussian kernel; P2K = quadratic kernel; P1K = linear kernel.