Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 5.
Published in final edited form as: Stat Med. 2012 Mar 22;31(15):1633–1651. doi: 10.1002/sim.4493

Table III.

Estimated type I error rate and power on a binary outcome.

Case GK Kernel (K) P2K P1K
LIKE BHLM BHLM (BF) LIKE BHLM BHLM (BF) LIKE BHLM BHLM (BF)
n = 60
p = 5
Type I Power 6 0.044 0.044 0.053 0.044 0.045 0.054 0.044 0.044 0.051
7 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
8 0.92 0.95 1 0.86 0.87 0.91 0.66 0.68 0.72
9 0.78 0.78 0.82 0.74 0.74 0.78 0.73 0.74 0.78
n = 60
p = 200
Type I Power 6 0.037 0.037 0.042 0.036 0.036 0.041 0.038 0.038 0.04
7 0.85 0.86 0.89 0.84 0.86 0.89 0.83 0.83 0.89
8 0.82 0.82 0.87 0.76 0.77 0.81 0.57 0.60 0.64
9 0.73 0.73 0.77 0.72 0.72 0.75 0.71 0.72 0.75

LIKE = LLG’s likelihood-based approach with kernel K by using a resampling-based inference; BHLM = Bayesian approach on hierarchical latent model with kernel K by using a resampling-based inference; BHLM (BF) = Bayesian approach on hierarchical latent model by using the Bayes factor; GK = Gaussian kernel; P2K = quadratic kernel; P1K = linear kernel.