. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 6.

Published in final edited form as: J Urol. 2012 Jun 15;188(2):514–520. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.04.001

Table 2.

Adjusted logistic regression modeling of risk factors related to erectile dysfunction in the UroEDIC cohort

Factors	OR (95% CI)	SE	p-value^†
Primary Prevention Cohort^* (intensive vs. conventional)	1.20 (0.64, 2.24)	.38	0.57
Secondary Intervention Cohort^* (intensive vs. conventional)	0.33 (0.17, 0.61)	.10	<0.001
Hemoglobin A1c at Eligibility (per HbA1c%)	1.30 (1.12, 1.50)	.14	<0.001
Diabetes Duration (per month)	1.00 (0.99, 1.01)	.0031	0.65
Age (per year)	1.13 (1.09, 1.17)	.021	<0.001
Primary v. Secondary Cohort	1.10 (0.60, 2.02)	.34	0.75

Logistic regression adjusted for DCCT intervention, HbA1c at eligibility, diabetes duration, age, primary vs. secondary cohort, interaction term for prevention cohort status and intensive vs. conventional glycemic control.