Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Assess. 2012 Aug 13;25(1):146–156. doi: 10.1037/a0029715

Table 2.

Measurement Method Characteristics

Measurement Method Characteristics n of
measurement
methods
% of methods
Type of Measurement Method (n =249)
Observational 178 71.5%
Written 65 26.1%
Psychometric Evaluation
Results reported 185 74.3%
Psychometric properties reported 87 35%
Reliability evidence provided
  Intraclass Correlations 43 17.3
Kendall’s Coefficient of Concordance 3 1.2%
Cronbach’s alpha provided 19 7.6%
  Cohen’s Kappa 13 5.2%
Validity evidence
  Convergence, concurrent, or discriminant 6 – 11 2.4 – 4.4%
  Association of adherence with outcomes 26 10.4%
Details of Observational Data Collection (n = 178)
Audio recording 100 56.2%
Video recording 73 41%
Live observation 5 2.8%
Treatment Session Sampling Strategy
Not reported 94 52.8%
Proportion of treatment sessions coded 140 78.7%
    20 – 25% of sessions 23 27%
Entire session coded 144 80%
Session segments coded 11 6.2%
Coding Personnel
  Clinicians 57 22.9%
  University students or research assistants 67 26.9%
  Study authors or treatment experts 51 20.5%
Details of Written Data Collection (n=65)
Treatment Session Sampling Strategy
All sessions 43 66.2%
Once weekly 6 9.2%
  Once monthly 4 6.2%
Respondents
  Therapists 56 86.2%
  Clients 11 16.9%
1

Percentages within categories often total more than 100% since one adherence measurement method may be used in multiple clinical contexts within and across studies.