Table 2.
Study |
Number of studies |
Type of interventions included |
Type of study populations |
Effect sizesa |
Significant moderators |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Prevention |
Treatment |
Children/Youth |
Adult |
Culturally adapted vs. heterogeneous controlsb |
Culturally adapted vs. un-adapted psychotherapyc |
|
||
D | 95% CI | d | 95% CI | |||||||
Benish et al.
[18] |
59 |
|
X |
X |
X |
0.41* |
0.38, 0.48 |
0.32* |
0.21, 0.43 |
• Adaptation to client’s explanatory models |
0.33** |
0.13, 0.29 |
0.21** |
0.13, 0.26 |
|||||||
Huey et al.
[19] |
25 |
|
X |
X |
|
0.44** |
0.32, 0.56 |
|
|
• Type of comparison group with largest effect sizes for no treatment control and placebo versus treatment as usual |
Griner et al.
[20] |
76 |
X |
X |
X |
X |
0.45d, ** |
0.36, 0.53 |
|
|
• Age: Older participants had higher effect sizes than younger participants |
0.40e, ** |
0.30, 0.49 |
• Hispanic ethnicity: Higher percentage of Hispanic participants had higher effect sizes than studies with lower percentage of Hispanic participants |
||||||||
• Racially homogenous samples: Studies with racially homogenous samples had higher effect sizes than studies with racially heterogeneous samples | ||||||||||
• Language: Studies that reported language match had higher effect sizes than studies that did not report language match | ||||||||||
• Acculturation: Adaptation seem to benefit most low acculturated Hispanics compared to Hispanics with moderate levels of acculturation | ||||||||||
Smith et al.
[21] |
65 |
|
X |
X |
X |
0.46** |
0.36, 0.56a |
|
|
• Treatment delivered to specific cultural groups were more effective than those delivered to mixed racial/ethnic groups |
|
• Adapting therapeutic goals to match client’s goals |
|||||||||
• Using metaphors/symbols in therapy to match client’s cultural world views |
Note: aAll effect sizes reported in the studies reviewed were computed so that positive values indicate greater benefit for culturally adapted treatment over their comparison group; bIn these comparisons, culturally adapted treatments are compared to heterogeneous controls conditions that include other un-adapted treatment, usual care, waitlist conditions, and attention control; cIn these comparisons, specific culturally adapted psychotherapies are compared to the same un-adapted psychotherapy; deffect sizes for all studies included in this meta-analysis; eeffect size for studies that only compared culturally adapted interventions to an ‘alternative intervention.’ *Primary measures; **All measures.