Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug 19;8:90. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-90

Table 2.

Summary of meta-analyses of culturally adapted mental health treatments

Study
Number of studies
Type of interventions included
Type of study populations
Effect sizesa
Significant moderators
 
 
Prevention
Treatment
Children/Youth
Adult
Culturally adapted vs. heterogeneous controlsb
Culturally adapted vs. un-adapted psychotherapyc
 
            D 95% CI d 95% CI  
Benish et al. [18]
59
 
X
X
X
0.41*
0.38, 0.48
0.32*
0.21, 0.43
• Adaptation to client’s explanatory models
0.33**
0.13, 0.29
0.21**
0.13, 0.26
Huey et al. [19]
25
 
X
X
 
0.44**
0.32, 0.56
 
 
• Type of comparison group with largest effect sizes for no treatment control and placebo versus treatment as usual
Griner et al. [20]
76
X
X
X
X
0.45d, **
0.36, 0.53
 
 
• Age: Older participants had higher effect sizes than younger participants
0.40e, **
0.30, 0.49
• Hispanic ethnicity: Higher percentage of Hispanic participants had higher effect sizes than studies with lower percentage of Hispanic participants
• Racially homogenous samples: Studies with racially homogenous samples had higher effect sizes than studies with racially heterogeneous samples
• Language: Studies that reported language match had higher effect sizes than studies that did not report language match
• Acculturation: Adaptation seem to benefit most low acculturated Hispanics compared to Hispanics with moderate levels of acculturation
Smith et al. [21]
65
 
X
X
X
0.46**
0.36, 0.56a
 
 
• Treatment delivered to specific cultural groups were more effective than those delivered to mixed racial/ethnic groups
 
• Adapting therapeutic goals to match client’s goals
  • Using metaphors/symbols in therapy to match client’s cultural world views

Note: aAll effect sizes reported in the studies reviewed were computed so that positive values indicate greater benefit for culturally adapted treatment over their comparison group; bIn these comparisons, culturally adapted treatments are compared to heterogeneous controls conditions that include other un-adapted treatment, usual care, waitlist conditions, and attention control; cIn these comparisons, specific culturally adapted psychotherapies are compared to the same un-adapted psychotherapy; deffect sizes for all studies included in this meta-analysis; eeffect size for studies that only compared culturally adapted interventions to an ‘alternative intervention.’ *Primary measures; **All measures.