Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 6;8(9):e73702. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073702

Table 4. The distribution of trait-by-trait performance across the 191entries phenotyped (the ones not showing residual heterozygosity as well as phenotypic variation), and the statistical significance of the three morphology-based groups identified.

Trait code Average St. Dev. ANOVAbetween groups Post hoc test Group average
1 vs 2 1 vs 3 2 vs 3 1 2 3
pcol 74.57 15.60 *** NS NS *** 79.89 69.21 81.61
pglo 2.37 0.73 *** NS ** *** 2.36 2.19 2.76
fcur 2.08 1.38 *** *** *** NS 3.95 1.61 1.03
fw 256.97 122.26 *** *** *** *** 148.28 243.99 395.11
fl 14.39 5.53 *** *** *** ** 21.43 13.16 9.32
fdmax 7.39 2.59 *** *** *** *** 4.53 7.28 10.74
fdmaxp 5.84 0.72 *** ** *** *** 6.48 5.84 5.05
fs 2.49 1.88 *** *** *** *** 5.03 1.95 0.88
firm 5.33 1.62 *** ** *** *** 3.58 5.72 6.38
lha 1.91 1.15 NS NS NS NS 1.58 2.05 1.98
adlan 1.37 1.49 *** *** ** *** 1.79 0.42 3.13
stean 2.80 1.84 *** *** ** *** 3.59 1.53 4.95
cacov 2.44 0.74 NS NS NS NS 2.29 2.52 2.28
fcpri 1.65 1.83 NS NS NS NS 1.35 1.88 1.16
lepri 0.43 0.65 *** NS * * 0.46 0.51 0.20
hab 3.83 1.62 *** *** NS *** 2.94 4.47 3.41
inflw 1.94 0.95 *** NS * *** 2.20 1.99 1.52
flwab 2.24 0.76 NS NS NS NS 2.25 2.25 2.32
flwt 86.43 5.97 NS NS NS NS 85.90 86.48 85.98
*

P<0.05

**

P<0.01

***

P<0.001